Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder, Developmental Coordination Disorder, and typical development differ in characteristics of dynamic postural control: A preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) are developmental disorders with distinct definitions and symptoms. However, both conditions share difficulties with motor skills, including impairments in postural control. While studies have explored postural sway variables in children with DCD and ASD as compared to typical development (TD), few have used kinematic data to assess the magnitude of differences between these two neurodevelopmental conditions. There are few sensitive and specific measures available to assess balance impairment severity in these populations. RESEARCH QUESTION: Do individuals with ASD, DCD, and TD differ in dynamic postural control? METHODS: We quantified postural control differences between ASD, DCD, and TD during a dynamic balance task. 10 ASD, 10 DCD, and 8 TD agematched children completed a dynamic postural control task in a virtual environment. They leaned to shift their center of pressure (CoP) to match a user-controlled object to an oscillating target (0.1 Hz-0.8 Hz). RESULTS: The DCD group had higher CoP accelerations compared to ASD or TD. While the DCD and TD groups did not differ in their medial-lateral velocity, the ASD group had low medial-lateral velocity and acceleration as compared to DCD and TD. ASD group velocity and acceleration did not differ from that of the TD group in the anterior-posterior direction. Higher accelerations in the DCD group reflected non-fluid movements; by contrast, the ASD group had slower, more fluid movements. Results may reflect differences in how children with ASD and DCD plan, execute, and modify motor actions. SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates the potential utility of CoP acceleration and velocity as a sensitive and specific means of differentiating between ASD, DCD, and TD. Results indicating group differences between ASD and DCD in velocity and acceleration profiles represent an important step toward understanding how these populations modify motor plans during dynamic tasks.

The new affordances in the home environment for motor development - infant scale (AHEMD-IS): Versions in English and Portuguese languages.

The home environment has been established as a crucial factor for motor development, especially in infants. Exploring the home environment can have significant implications for intervention, as it is common practice in physical therapy to have professionals advise patients on home activities. Since 2010, our group has been working on the development of the Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development - Infant Scale (AHEMD-IS), a parental self-reporting instrument designed to assess the quality and quantity of factors (affordances) in the home environment. In Brazil, the instrument has been translated as "Affordances no Ambiente Domiciliar para o Desenvolvimento Motor - Escala Bebê", and it has been extensively used in several studies that address infant development. These studies in Brazil and other parts of the world highly recommended the need for a normative sample and standardized scoring system. A description of the study that addressed that need, along with the English version of the questionnaire and score sheets, was recently published in the well-known and respected journal Physical Therapy. Our intent with the present short communication is to notify Brazilian investigators and clinicians of this latest update so they can download the new instrument, as well as present the Brazilian (Portuguese) version of the AHEMD-IS along with its scoring system.

Comparações entre o desempenho motor e oportunidades de estimulação motora no ambiente domiciliar de lactentes residentes nas regiões Sudeste e Norte do Brasil / Comparaciones del desempeño motor y oportunidades de estimulación motora en el entorno del hogar de lactantes moradores en las regiones Sureste y Norte de Brasil / Comparisons between motor performance and opportunities for motor stimulation in the home environment of infants from the North and Southwest regions in Brazil

A proposta deste estudo foi comparar as relações entre o desempenho motor e as características do ambiente familiar (espaço físico, atividades diárias, brinquedos) de lactentes residentes em duas regiões do Brasil, Norte (Marabá, PA) e Sudeste (Piracicaba, SP). Foram utilizados a Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) para a análise do desempenho motor e o Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development - Infant Scale (AHEMD-IS) para a análise do ambiente familiar em oitenta lactentes de 3 a 18 meses de idade. Os grupos dos dois municípios não diferiram quanto ao desempenho motor (p>0,05), porém, foram encontradas diferenças significativas entre os grupos no que se refere à frequência em creches, à escolaridade paterna e ao número de quartos nas residências. Os resultados também indicaram diferenças significativas para as oportunidades no lar, com o grupo de Marabá obtendo pontuações significativamente menores na maior parte do AHEMD-IS: espaço externo (p=0,021), brinquedos para motricidade fina (p<0,001) e grossa (p<0,001), e o escore total do AHEMD-IS (p=0,002). Não foram encontradas diferenças entre os grupos nas atividades diárias e no espaço interno da residência. O desempenho motor e as oportunidades no ambiente domiciliar (total do AHEMD-IS) demonstraram uma correlação fraca tanto para o grupo de Marabá (r=0,33; p=0,03) quanto para o grupo de Piracicaba (r=0,45; p<0,001). Em conclusão, apesar dos grupos apresentarem níveis de desenvolvimento motor similares, o grupo de lactentes em Marabá apresentou menos affordances (oportunidades de ação) comparados aos residentes de Piracicaba, o que, no futuro, pode resultar em diferenças no desempenho motor dos grupos.

En este estudio tuvo el propósito de comparar las relaciones entre el desempeño motor y las características del entorno del hogar (el espacio físico, las actividades diarias, los juguetes) de lactantes moradores en dos regiones de Brasil, el Norte (Marabá, PA) y el Sureste (Piracicaba, SP). Se utilizaron el Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) para el desempeño motor y el Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development Infant Scale (AHEMD-IS) para el análisis del entorno del hogar en ochenta lactantes de 3 hasta 18 meses de edad. Los grupos de los dos municipios no presentaron diferencias significativas en relación al desempeño motor (p>0,05), sin embargo, se encontraron diferencias significativas en lo que se refiere a la asistencia a guardería, al nivel de educación del padre y al número de habitaciones en sus casas. Los resultados también mostraron diferencias significativas en las oportunidades en los hogares, el grupo de Marabá obtuvo puntuaciones significativamente menores en la mayor parte del AHEMD-IS: espacio externo (p=0,021), juguetes para habilidades motoras finas (p<0,001) y gruesas (p<0,001), y el escore total del AHEMD-IS (p=0,002). En cuanto a las actividades diarias y al espacio interno de las casas no se encontraron diferencias. El desempeño motor y las oportunidades en el entorno del hogar (total del AHEMD-IS) mostraron una correlación baja tanto para el grupo del Marabá (r=0,33; p=0,03) como para el de Piracicaba (r=0,45; p<0,001). Aunque los grupos presentaron niveles semejantes de desarrollo motor, se concluyó que el grupo de lactantes de Marabá presentó menos affordances (oportunidades de acción) que el de Piracicaba, lo que puede resultar en diferencias para su futuro en relación al desempeño motor de los grupos.

This study aimed at comparing the relationships between motor development and the characteristics in the home environment (physical space, daily activities, toys) of infants in two Brazilian regions, North (Marabá, PA) and Southeast (Piracicaba, SP). Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) was used to analyze motor development, and Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development - Infant Scale (AHEMD-IS) was used in order to analyze the family environments of eight breastfeed babies of 3 to 18 months of age. The groups in the two municipalities were not different in regards to motor development (p<0.05); however, significant differences were found among groups concerning day care frequency, fatherly schooling, and number of rooms in households. The results also indicated significant differences for opportunities at home, with the group from Marabá receiving significantly lower scores for the most part of the AHEMD-IS: external space (p=0.021), toys for fine motor skills (p<0.001), and total AHEMD-IS score (p=0.002). No differences were found among groups in daily activities and the internal space of homes. Motor development and opportunities in the home environment (total AHEMD-IS) were found to have weaker correlations for both the group from Marabá (r=0.33; p=0.03) and the group from Piracicaba (r=0.45; p<0.001). In summary, although both groups had similar motor development levels, the group of infants from Marabá was found to have fewer affordances (opportunities for action) as compared to the ones living in Piracicaba, which may result in differences in the motor development of the groups in the future.

Further Development and Validation of the Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development-Infant Scale (AHEMD-IS).

BACKGROUND: Affordances in the home environment may play a significant role in infant motor development. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to further develop and validate the Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development-Infant Scale (AHEMD-IS), an inventory that measures the quantity and quality of motor affordances in the home. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate criteria for content validity, reliability, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, and interpretability of the instrument. METHODS: A pilot version of the inventory with 5 dimensions was used for expert panel analysis and administered to parents of infants (N=419). Data were analyzed with Cronbach alpha, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), ceiling and floor effects, and item and dimension interpretability analyses for creation of a scoring system with descriptive categories for each dimension and total score. RESULTS: Average agreement among the expert panel was 95% across all evaluation criteria. Cronbach alpha values with the 41-item scale ranged between .639 and .824 for the separate dimensions, with a total value of .824 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]=.781, .862). The ICC values were .990 for interrater reliability and .949 for intrarater reliability. There was a ceiling effect on 3 questions for the Inside Space dimension and on 3 questions for the Variety of Stimulation dimension. These results demonstrated the need for reduction in total items (from 41 to 35) and the combination of space dimensions. After removal of questions, internal consistency was .766 (95% CI=.729, .800) for total score. Overall assessment categories were created as: less than adequate, moderately adequate, adequate, and excellent. LIMITATIONS: The inventory does not determine specific use (time, frequency) of affordances in the home, and it does not account for infants' out-of-home activities. CONCLUSIONS: The AHEMD-IS is a reliable and valid instrument to assess affordances in the home environment that promote infant motor development.

Using a generalized linear mixed model approach to explore the role of age, motor proficiency, and cognitive styles in children's reach estimation accuracy.

The purpose was to use a multi-level statistical technique to analyze how children's age, motor proficiency, and cognitive styles interact to affect accuracy on reach estimation tasks via Motor Imagery and Visual Imagery. Results from the Generalized Linear Mixed Model analysis (GLMM) indicated that only the 7-year-old age group had significant random intercepts for both tasks. Motor proficiency predicted accuracy in reach tasks, and cognitive styles (object scale) predicted accuracy in the motor imagery task. GLMM analysis is suitable to explore age and other parameters of development. In this case, it allowed an assessment of motor proficiency interacting with age to shape how children represent, plan, and act on the environment.

Effect of the home environment on motor and cognitive behavior of infants.

Although information is sparse, research suggests that affordances in the home provide essential resources that promote motor and cognitive skills in young children. The present study assessed over time, the association between motor affordances in the home and infant motor and cognitive behavior. Thirty-two (32) infants were assessed for characteristics of their home using the Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development--Infant Scale and motor and cognitive behavior with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development--III. Infant's home and motor behavior were assessed at age 9 months and 6 months later with the inclusion of cognitive ability. Results for motor ability indicated that there was an overall improvement in performance from the 1st to the 2nd assessment. We found significant positive correlations between the dimensions of the home (daily activities and play materials) and global motor performance (1st assessment) and fine-motor performance on the 2nd assessment. In regard to cognitive performance (2nd assessment), results indicated a positive association with fine-motor performance. Our results suggest that motor affordances can have a positive impact on future motor ability and speculatively, later cognitive behavior in infants.

Limitations of the Neurological Evolutional Exam (ENE) as a motor assessment for first graders.

BACKGROUND: many clinicians and researchers in Brazil consider the Neurological Developmental Exam (NDE), a valid and reliable assessment for Brazilian school-aged children. However, since its inception, several tests have emerged that, according to some researchers, provide more in-depth evaluation of motor ability and go beyond the detection of general motor status (soft neurological signs). OBJECTIVES: to highlight the limitations of the NDE as a motor skill assessment for first graders. METHODS: thirty-five children were compared on seven selected items of the NDE, seven of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test (BOT), and seven of the Visual-Motor Integration test (VMI). Participants received a "pass" or "fail" score for each item, as prescribed by the respective test manual. RESULTS: chi-square and ANOVA results indicated that the vast majority of children (74%) passed the NDE items, whereas values for the other tests were 29% (BOT) and 20% (VMI). Analysis of specific categories (e.g. visual, fine, and gross motor coordination) revealed a similar outcome. CONCLUSIONS: our data suggest that while the NDE may be a valid and reliable test for the detection of general motor status, its use as a diagnostic/remedial tool for identifying motor ability is questionable. One of our recommendations is the consideration of a revised NDE in light of the current needs of clinicians and researchers.

Limitations of the Neurological Evolutional Exam (ENE) as a motor assessment for first graders / Limitações do Exame Neurológico Evolutivo (ENE) como um instrumento de avaliação motora para crianças da primeira série

BACKGROUND: Many clinicians and researchers in Brazil consider the Neurological Developmental Exam (NDE), a valid and reliable assessment for Brazilian school-aged children. However, since its inception, several tests have emerged that, according to some researchers, provide more in-depth evaluation of motor ability and go beyond the detection of general motor status (soft neurological signs). OBJECTIVES: To highlight the limitations of the NDE as a motor skill assessment for first graders. METHODS: Thirty-five children were compared on seven selected items of the NDE, seven of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test (BOT), and seven of the Visual-Motor Integration test (VMI). Participants received a "pass" or "fail" score for each item, as prescribed by the respective test manual. RESULTS: Chi-square and ANOVA results indicated that the vast majority of children (74 percent) passed the NDE items, whereas values for the other tests were 29 percent (BOT) and 20 percent (VMI). Analysis of specific categories (e.g. visual, fine, and gross motor coordination) revealed a similar outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that while the NDE may be a valid and reliable test for the detection of general motor status, its use as a diagnostic/remedial tool for identifying motor ability is questionable. One of our recommendations is the consideration of a revised NDE in light of the current needs of clinicians and researchers.

CONTEXTUALIZAÇÃO: Muitos clínicos e pesquisadores brasileiros consideram o Exame Neurológico Evolutivo (ENE), um instrumento válido e confiável para crianças brasileiras em idade escolar. Entretanto, desde a sua criação, surgiram outros testes para uma avaliação mais profunda de habilidade motora, os quais vão além de detectar status motor geral em forma de sinais neurológicos leves. OBJETIVOS: Demonstrar os pontos fracos do ENE como teste de avaliação de habilidade motora para crianças de primeira série. MÉTODOS: Trinta e cinco crianças realizaram 7 itens selecionados do ENE, 7 do teste Bruininks-Oseretsky (BOT) e 7 do Visual-Motor Integration Test (VMI), numa sessão única de 30 minutos. Para cada item, os participantes receberam a classificação "êxito" ou "fracasso", como prescrito por cada manual. RESULTADOS: Os testes chi-quadrado e ANOVA indicaram que a vasta maioria das crianças (74 por cento) passaram nos itens do ENE, enquanto os valores para os outros testes foram 29 por cento (BOT) e 20 por cento (VMI). Análises das categorias específicas (fino, visual e motor grosso) revelaram um resultado similar. CONCLUSÕES: Estes dados sugerem que, enquanto o ENE pode ser um teste válido e confiável para detecção de status motor geral, a sua atuação como instrumento diagnóstico e de encaminhamento para identificação de habilidade motora é questionável. Uma das nossas recomendações é a consideração de uma versão do ENE revisada, baseada nas necessidades atuais de profissionais clínicos e pesquisadores.